<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Taylor Davidson - Latest Comments in Splintering Conversations</title><link>http://taylordavidson.disqus.com/</link><description>Photography, Culture, Travel, Change</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:06:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Splintering Conversations</title><link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/05/08/splintering-conversations/#comment-437966</link><description>True...  while the intent for many social networking sites may be about entertainment, users use them to communicate with people, and many sites are adding features to make it about communication.  Facebook's launch of IM within the site is a perfect example.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point: "entertainment" isn't really a two-sided conversation, but meant to be a one-way publishing of thoughts, ideas, content.  Even so, entertainment often sparks more thoughts and a conversation about its meaning, so it's important for us to learn how to efficiently share our ideas around what we create.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tdavidson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:06:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Splintering Conversations</title><link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/05/08/splintering-conversations/#comment-437823</link><description>Some interesting points.  But I think the intent behind social networking sites, many forums, and many blogs is entertainment and not conversation.  And often when conversation is the intent, it should be regarded as entertainment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:50:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>